About this Show

Washington Week

News/Business. (2010) President Barack Obama's foreign policy credentials are tested; Sarah Palin's role with the Tea Party movement; U.S. Supreme Court docket. New. (CC) (Stereo)

NETWORK

DURATION
00:30:00

RATING

SCANNED IN
Annapolis, MD, USA

SOURCE
Comcast Cable

TUNER
Channel 79 (555 MHz)

VIDEO CODEC
mpeg2video

AUDIO CODEC
ac3

PIXEL WIDTH
704

PIXEL HEIGHT
480

TOPIC FREQUENCY

Washington 26, Sarah Palin 9, Elena Kagan 4, Michele Norris 3, Barbara Bush 3, Joan 3, Alaska 3, Afghanistan 3, Joe Bruns 2, Arizona 2, Gwen Ifill 2, Lisbon 2, Iowa 2, Karl Rove 2, Prudential 2, Korea 2, Newseum 2, Us 2, Joe 2, Barack Obama 2,
Borrow a DVD
of this show
  WETA    Washington Week    News/Business.  (2010) President Barack Obama's foreign  
   policy credentials are tested; Sarah Palin's role with the Tea...  

    November 26, 2010
    8:00 - 8:30pm EST  

8:00pm
michele: the turkey has been served, the cash registers are ringing, but there's a lot of work ahead in the nation's capital. i'm michele norris sitting in for gwen ifill this week. questions of leadership, law, and presidential ambition tonight on "washington week." a thanksgiving week break makes way for a full plate ahead. for the president, there are big challenges at home. >> in the coming days it's so important, in the coming months it's so important that democrats and republicans work together. the election's over. we've got to find places where we can agree. michele: and challenges abroad. >> it is important for the american people to remember that afghanistan is not just an american battle. michele: for the g.o.p., is the
8:01pm
republican with the most name recognition serious about running in 2012? >> if you ran for president, could you beat barack obama? >> i believe so. michele: and the supreme court, with a new justice on the bench, prepares to chew on several weighty issues, including immigration and benefits for returning veterans. covering these stories, peter baker of the "new york times," john dickerson of "slate magazine" and cbs news, and joan biskupic of "usa today." >> award-winning reporting and analysis. covering history as it happens. live from our nation's capitol, this is "washington week with gwen ifill," produced in association with "national journal." corporate funding for "washington week" is provided by -- >> in 1975, my professor at berkeley asked me if i wanted to change the world. i said sure. that's the start of it.
8:02pm
exxonmobil have built a new facility to identify the most productive strains of algae. they are amazing little creatures. they secrete oils which we can change into biofuels. they absorb co2. we're hoping to supplement the fuel that we use in our vehicles. to do this at a large enough scale to some day help the -- meet the world's energy demands. >> this rock has never stood still. since 1875, we have been there for our clients through good times and bad. when their needs changed, we were there to meet them. through the years from insurance to investment management, from real estate to retirement solutions, we developed new ideas for the financial challenges ahead. this rock has never stood still. and that's one thing that will never change. prudential. >> corporate funding is also provided by boeing and wells fargo advisors.
8:03pm
additional funding for "washington week" is provided by the ethics and he will concerns in journalism foundation, -- excellence in journalism foundation, the annenberg foundation, the corporation for public broadcasting and by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you. thank you. once again, substituting for gwen ifill, michele norris of npr. michele: good evening. i hope your thanksgiving holiday was bountiful. now that the president has finished his holiday celebrations, he faces a difficult road ahead. as the white house regroups after two overseas trips that produced mixed results, and as the administration reconsiders how to press ahead after mr. obama's self described "shellacking" in the mid-term elections. complicating matters, the u.s. must decide how to respond to north korea's military aggression this week. the president himself has
8:04pm
acknowledged that the weeks ahead present a test of leadership. and, peter, forget about the republican takeover of the house. it looks like the president has significant challenges in the lame duck session ahead. >> you think your plate is full, he has a lot on his plate and not a lot to be thankful. he has had a couple weeks since the election. look at what is on agenda since then. asian trade, tax cuts, nato summit, the new start traity, afghanistan transition, iran talks maybe, middle east maybe, unemployment, the dream act, the t.s.a. patdowns. that's before north korea starts opening fire at its southern neighbor. this is at a time when we should be thinking how to recalibrate his presidency to move ahead. any one of these things provide a test long before he has the chance to recatch his breath and think about what i want to do in this new political environment. >> i'm interesting in his thinking right now. you were on the overseas trip, you spent a lot of time with him.
8:05pm
he talked about the results of the midterm election as being a shell lacking and he said the republican victory wasn't exactly a resounding victory. it was almost like an unearned win. >> it's a message for the people to work together. the republicans see it as a mandate to stop what they see as the overreaching of president obama's agenda. you have this a remarkable moment where the president says come on down to the white house, we'll talk. the republicans say, we're going to come, but not when you say. let's wait another week or two. we have things to do, mr. president. next week's meeting, in fact, takes place, it will be an interesting test in this moment of bipartisanship or partisanship. >> let me ask you about another moment that we're at. we have come off of the foreign policy issues, the lisbon summit, the issue with north korea and on the front burner for a lot of people is the afghan pullout if it indeed happens. is that still on schedule? what did you learn in lisbon
8:06pm
about that and are things headed toward 2014? >> well, foreign policy is usually the refuge of a president who gets in trouble at home. that's the one place where congress doesn't have as much as a role to play and the president can look like a leader. it didn't work out well for on the asia trip. he came home with support from the europeans and the russian leader. >> we had to massage that a little bit. >> he had to massage that and it's not sure that will be very convincing to republicans in the united states senate when it comes to ratifying his treaty. north cabrera tells us you don't have control of this overseas agenda it's not what you want to do often. it's what comes up as a crisis for you to deal with. who wants to be refighting the korean war 60 years later. not barack obama and not most americans. >> the president is refighting another old battle when he comes back and meets with these republican leaders on tax cuts. if nothing happens, everybody gets a tax increase because the
8:07pm
bush tax cuts are going to expire. if you don't cut taxes for everybody, we're going to let them expire. the president said i want a permanent one for the middle class and he is open for a temporary one with the wealthy. they're at loggerheads but the president says they're going to work together. how is this resolved? >> there is a deadline. they're not leaving with a tax increase for all americans. i suppose a lot of unfathomable have happened, but it's hard to imagine. we're talking about what are the terms of the deal? are we going to have a deal now or punt it down the road? punting looks very viable at the moment for both sides. the question is how do you punt it? the white house would like to decouple them. one solution for the middle class tax cut, another solution for the wealthy. when we deal with the wealthy down the road, we extend it for a year or two years, it's not about everybody. the republicans say no way, we're not going to do that. it's all or nothing. >> peter, you talked about a
8:08pm
certain recalibration at the white house? what does that mean? we haven't seen a major shuffling yet? >> the personnel changes that we have seen before the election and probably coming up in the next few weeks are really about moving people around who are already inside president obama's orbit. david axelrod is likely to leave after the state of the union. his campaign manager from 2008 likely to come in in early january. this is not an influx of fresh voices and eyes and ears. what it says so far is the president doesn't see the need for a wholesale reshuffle. he looks down on the perennial washington solution to a political problem of, you know, throwing out a bunch of aides and bringing in some new ones. the problem is you have a bad economy and the choices that were made were ultimately made by the president. >> i'm wondering, we talked about the problem that the president and the white house faces. are there though some opportunities? i'm thinking about the start treaty? >> certainly.
8:09pm
in moments of trouble come moments of opportunity. certainly that has been true for past presidents. we saw that for president clinton after the 1994 election. for president obama, they hope on the new start treaty to shame the republicans in the senate to either go along with him which would make him long stronger after a pretty debilitating election night, for if for some reason, they were to block it, he can blame them and portray them as so unwilling to work with him that they would block a treaty that were endorsed by james baker and other republicans. >> everything is colored by the election. he just said during michele's introduction, the election is over. just what you said about the response on start and also what you said to john on the tax cuts, there is another election that is so much right there right now, 2012. >> one election is over, let the election begin. >> do we have any kind of window for the tax cuts, but maybe not
8:10pm
for start? >> speaking of 2012, making a slash with the release of her highly anticipated book, sarah palin in her latest publication, the former republican vice presidentful candidate tackles everything from politics to pop culture with her stringing critique of both obamas and her praise for simon cowell, the judge on "american idol." sarah palin seems to be everywhere all the once, with her alaska-based reality tv show, her daughter bristol's run for the top trophy on "dancing with the stars," her constant presence on twitter and the book tour that will take her to some of the major presidential primary states like arizona, iowa, and south carolina. but some high profile republicans are not cheering the palin parade including one prominent first lady and first mother. >> what's your read about sarah palin? >> i sat next to her once, thought she was beautiful. and i think she's very happy in alaska, and i hope she'll stay
8:11pm
there. >> add to that some recent polling that shows many people don't believe sah palin is qualified to be president. so, john, where is all this going? >> barbara bush, still throwing the elbow there all the way across the country. i think sarah palin has built this amazing machine which is on the one hand, it's a prepresidential machine, on the other hand, it's a book selling machine. they both have magically been able to serve each other. she is going out there and she is selling her book and the speculation begins in part because she is fueling it saying i'm thinking very seriously about a run. her husband is pushing her towards a run. she answers barbara walter's questions and says she thinks she can take on the president. she is an incredibly good marketer. for her purposes, she doesn't have to make a decision yet. they serve themselves. she looks like a person who is running for president. >> as we all know at this table, a presidential run is something quite different than just marketing a personality or
8:12pm
marketing a book. you wrote an interesting piece this week that lays out some of the obstacles she might face if she really decides to get serious? >> i think there are three big obstacles for sarah palin. one of the polls you mentioned. the biggest is her unfavorable rating, the average is 51, 52. that's quite high. not the highest it's ever been, bill clinton had a higher unfavorable rating. she has to get over that. people have to like you. she is popular with republicans, not popular with independents and moderates. there is the competency question. 61% said they didn't think she was qualified for the job. that includes a lot of republicans. the third is she is a hard worker. no one could be in so many places as she is. you almost expect to see her at the local starbucks. that hard work needs to translate into another kind of hard work for the campaign and campaigns are drudgery and they are unpleasant and so she would have to kind of buy into the grind of that because you can't
8:13pm
really fake it in a campaign. >> does she have early organization in iowa, new hampshire? >> she has the mama grizzlies. she has this extraordinary fan base. this is another reason why you can imagine she would run. as much as she loves alaska and her family, when you have these people that ask you to run, beg you, you can't resist this call. she has these people who are willing to crawl across the desert to work for her. that is a ready-made organization. it's not enough. rudy giuliani thought he had that support, so did fred thompson, just add water to the support and i'll win. those two candidate sis were total failures. she is smart enough to know about that. the organization would require expanding her circle. she has a tight-knit circle that works well for her. she has to expand it, trust people in states she doesn't know. that trust can be triplesome, you trust people that don't only have your interests as closely
8:14pm
in mind as the circle she has now. >> let me pick up on the barbara bush comment who represents the republican establishment if anybody does. can sarah palin pull this off without the republican establishment? >> well, if she is going to win, she will have to get around some of these obstacles. one of them is that this question about her competency and her popularity comes not just from the left or the lame street media as we're all calling it, which is another clever trick on her part, but she has got barbara bush, karl rove, murkowski who she has a personal spat, a senator from alaska. she can probably did it because the establishment will finally get in line with is power. there are a lot of establishment people thought at that time tea party thought they were noisy. mitch mcconnell gave up earmarks because the tea party holds control. she needs to get power in a way that the establishment can worry
8:15pm
about. you'll see people start to come behind her. >> what about the reality show? talk about that for a second. that is not a convectional path. this doesn't look presidential says karl rove. i was talking to someone else that wasn't a sarah palin fan. she came off authentic. it changes her view of her. >> they try to come across as you then particular, george herbert walker seeing in the clip, he ate pork rinds. they tried to do this with nixon which was a lost cause. sarah palin comes across in that show as quite authentic. you can't fake the things she is doing. she has that in her corner. that's why so many of her people, they love her. she is authentic and tells it like it is. the problem with the approval ratings, moderates and independents, if they don't like you you tell it like it is, she goes back to the 1960's. she disinters murphy brown, the
8:16pm
kennedy speech or religion, a lot of values, kind of confrontational things. if you're trying to get people like you, some may like it, others may think that is a little abrasive. how does this message mix with the tv show? that mix will determine whether she is able to do it or not. michele: meanwhile, over at the supreme court, we are two months into the latest term. it is a court with three women on the bench for the first time, but nonetheless, there have not been big ideological shifts. the court will tackle or consider a number of hot button issues in the weeks ahead, including a controversial immigration statute in arizona and a class action civil rights lawsuit against wal-mart. but first, joan, what have we seen in the early months of this newly composed court. >> you have been watching sarah palin, elena kagan is in our sights. she is the newest justice. we have just sotomayor who has
8:17pm
been on six months herself. it's a whole new bench. both of those new justices are quite active. elena kagan because she used to be the government's top lawyer before the supreme court has had to recuse herself, take herself out of a handful of government cases. in the ones that she is in, she is very focused. she mixes it up. she gets in there and asks a lot of pointed questions. she is a real player during or alarguments and on the -- oral arguments and on the law. she is making a difference. at the same time, despite the changes, we have seen a lot of the same ideological divisions, five conservatives still on the bench, chief justice john roberts and sca leah, kennedy, thomas, and alito on one side and the liberal appointees from presidents clinton and obama on the other side. that emerged, for example, in one case, the justices by a 5-4 vote let an arizona murderer be
8:18pm
executed with a lethal injection that was part from chemicals obtained abroad. it was the very first time that apparently lethal injection had gone forward with chemicals that were not manufactured here and it was the conservative majority led by john robert saying no, we don't think there is any problem, but the liberals protested, elena kagan cast her first major vote there. >> joan, there are a lot of interesting cases ahead, is there one in particular that is worth talking about? >> that's a tough question. they're all so interesting. let me tell you that is under the radar screen in light of the fact that we're in two wars right now in afghanistan and iraq. there is a case that will be heard on december 6, monday, in the new sitting where the justices will look at a veteran from the korean war who was denied some veterans benefits.
8:19pm
he had come back from cabrera with paranoid schizophrenia, he had been deemed 100% disabled because of the service and the mental health issues. he had filed for additional in-home care as an older vet, had been denied and missed a deadline for appeal by this 120-day deadline for appeal by a short period and was shut down in all lower courts. they said you missed the deadline, you don't get benefits. so he is appealing in a case that's very sympathetic for him. he has recently passed away and his widow has taken the case. what do we have, about 40,000 returning vets with injuries who are all going through the v.a. system. it's going to be a very important case to see how the justices interpret this statute and say, you missed a deadline, pal, you're out of luck. >> you talk about chief justice roberts, he has been on the court five years. what do we learn about him as a leader of this court? how has he put his mark on it? >> it's interesting, he has been
8:20pm
part of this very conservative block still. he is liked among his colleagues, that's for sure, but he has not been as willing to compromise on some things as it appeared that his predecessor, chief just william rehnquist did. he has been pretty hardlined. at oral arguments, i was mentioning to michele, he had to play a bit of a traffic cop role now because of how active this bench is. i have heard him say, he'll be watching arguments, could you please go back to the justice breyer's question, you were cut off by justice sca leah. he has shown himself to be consistently what president bush wanted on the court, a strong conservative. >> joan, do we know anything about how these new folks get along? is there any special relationships that have grown in this new court? >> that's a good question. they're appointed for life, so for better or for worse. elena kagan recently when skeet
8:21pm
shooting with our favorite hunting justice, justice sca leah, they get along splendidly. she is her kind of liberal. ruth bader ginsberg is a friend of his also. they go to the opera together. kagan used to be at the law school where they went. they are pals. >> where they show up for the state of the union. >> steven breyer says it's a lot of fun, he'll go. i don't know that all of them will. michele: that will wrap it up for tonight, but our conversation continues on-line with the "washington week" webcast extra. be sure to check it out at pbs.org. and also look for our latest entry from the vault where we take you back to thanksgiving week, 1993. i'm michele norris. gwen will be back around the table next week, on "washington week." good night.
8:22pm
>> download our weekly podcast and take us with you. it's the "washington week" podcast at washingtonweek@pbs.org at pbs.org. >> "washington week" was produced by weta, which is solely responsible for its content. funding for "washington week" is provided by -- >> we know why we're here. to connect our forces to what they need when they need it. >> help troops see danger before
8:23pm
it sees them. >> to answer the call of the brave and bring them safely home. >> around the globe, the people of boeing are working together to support and protect all who serve. >> that's why we're here. >> does one thing dave has always wanted to do when he retires, keep working, but for himself. as his financial advisor, i looked at everything he had, the 401(k), the insurance policies, and even money he has invested elsewhere. building a retirement plan to help him launch as a second career, flight school. go, dave! >> with you when you need a financial advisor fully invested with you. wells fargo advicers, together we'll go far. >> corps funding is also provided by exxonmobil and prudential financial. additional funding for
8:24pm
"washington week" is provided by the ethics in excellence foundation, the annenburg foundation, the corporation for public broadcasting and by contributions to your pbs station from viewers like you, thank you. >> for more than 40 years, "washington week" has provided the most interesting political conversation of the week. hello, i'm david ginder along with weta's chief operating officer joe bruns. each week on "washington week" gwen ifill leads a robust round table discussion with award-winning journalists who provide major stories he wantnating from the nation's capital. "washington week" is the longest running prime time news and public affairs program on television and one that we are very proud of here here at weta. but it has continued for all these years thanks to the support of viewers like you who have invested in a very real sense invested in the program.
8:25pm
when you call now and make an investment in weta, you can count yourself as one of the supporters of "washington week." joe, we talk about the uniqueness of "washington week" and how it has been around for 40 years. what in your mind makes "washington week" a unique news and public affairs program? >> i think the real distinguishing feature of "washington week" is that the guests who are on "washington week" are actual reporters. they are beat reporters covering the story. they have their sources and on "washington week," gwen is able to draw them out and get behind the story and get a much greater depth of understanding about what the story is really all about. these are not people who are known for their opinions. as a matter of fact, they keep their opinion out of it. they are true reporters and i think they give you that insight that you won't get on, for example, the sunday morning talk shows. >> we talk about joe, how important it is for people to become members of weta, to make programs like "washington week" possible. in your judgment, what is the
8:26pm
members' role in keeping a program like "washington week" on the air and as it is? >> sure. david, the individual donor is the cornerstone of our financing. the individual donor keeps all of these programs including "washington week" on the air. we depend upon their contributions and their contributions constitute the majority of funding that weta is able to raise. and that's why we're here tonight and i would like to make a special appeal to you. your "washington week" viewers, you're among our most loyal viewers. many of you are our most loyal donors but i would ask you now to consider if you're not a donor to pick up the telephone or go to our website and make that contribution right now. if you are a donor, i'd like you to consider increasing your donation to weta to help us keep programs like "washington week," newshour, front line and others and bring the best in
8:27pm
programming. >> and when you do make that call to the number on your screen we have some very special thank you gifts. if you pledge $60, we'll send you the new "washington week" glass mug. for a $100 donation, ask for the "washington week" mini umbrella. with a pledge of $150, you receive the "washington week" business tote. and here's something very special, when you pledge $35 or more during this break, you'll receive a pair of general admission tickets to the newseum, courtesy a newseum, 500 years of headline history. >> when you pledge $35 or more and become a new member of weta, you'll receive five great gifts. a one-year subscription to "newsweek" magazine, a weta eotote, the weta magazine and the member decal and lapel pin. call right now and support public television by becoming a weta member today.
8:28pm
>> thousands of people throughout the washington area support weta because they appreciate the insights that our programs bring to the community. somewhere in the world, tomorrow's big news story is already unfolding. a researcher is on the brink of a scientific breakthrough, a little known fringe group is on the verge of making headlines. and on weta, these stories are being told right now because they will affect our future. our world is much more than just today's heinz and weta lets everyone explore what's next. so that we can take action now to learn more and plan an adventure or to support a cause. if you have made a contribution to this brief break, we thank you very much for your support. if you haven't, then we will be here for a few more minutes hoping to hear from you with the call on the number on your screen or pledge online at weta.org. thank you joe bruns and thank
8:29pm